🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with white audiences about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since that time, giving reduced attention to the histories of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the observance is celebrated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the summer we observed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels emboldened to declare that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to scrub Black history and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a organized and extensive campaign to alter the country's historical narrative” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Given these circumstances, the month illustrates how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just do away with observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an time that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already beginning to do), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and provides room for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not taken seriously. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. It could be that an complete renaming is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.